The pipeline was very similar to icon-to-image above: ask Opus 4.5 to fulfill a long list of constraints with the addition of Python bindings. But there’s another thing that I wanted to test that would be extremely useful if it worked: WebAssembly (WASM) output with wasm-bindgen. Rust code compiled to WASM allows it to be run in any modern web browser with the speed benefits intact: no dependencies needed, and therefore should be future-proof. However, there’s a problem: I would have to design an interface and I am not a front end person, and I say without hyperbole that for me, designing even a simple HTML/CSS/JS front end for a project is more stressful than training an AI. However, Opus 4.5 is able to take general guidelines and get it into something workable: I first told it to use Pico CSS and vanilla JavaScript and that was enough, but then I had an idea to tell it to use shadcn/ui — a minimalistic design framework normally reserved for Web Components — along with screenshots from that website as examples. That also worked.
Москвичей предупредили о резком похолодании09:45
，详情可参考Line官方版本下载
However, there are more permanent ends afoot. Bridgerton has dabbled with loss, mainly through the omnipresent absence of Bridgerton patriarch Edmund, but death has always happened offscreen or long ago. A hard clash with the splendour, romance, and pink fluffy set decoration of the season, elements of Part 2 find themselves draped in mourning black. It's one of the events of the Bridgerton books which readers know well has been sitting on the horizon from the very first Netflix season. I won't spoil it here, but suffice to say main characters are sent down the "winding and illogical path" of grief and guilt — a hard pivot from gossip, filling one's dance card, and taking tea.，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息
It’s Not AI Psychosis If It Works#Before I wrote my blog post about how I use LLMs, I wrote a tongue-in-cheek blog post titled Can LLMs write better code if you keep asking them to “write better code”? which is exactly as the name suggests. It was an experiment to determine how LLMs interpret the ambiguous command “write better code”: in this case, it was to prioritize making the code more convoluted with more helpful features, but if instead given commands to optimize the code, it did make the code faster successfully albeit at the cost of significant readability. In software engineering, one of the greatest sins is premature optimization, where you sacrifice code readability and thus maintainability to chase performance gains that slow down development time and may not be worth it. Buuuuuuut with agentic coding, we implicitly accept that our interpretation of the code is fuzzy: could agents iteratively applying optimizations for the sole purpose of minimizing benchmark runtime — and therefore faster code in typical use cases if said benchmarks are representative — now actually be a good idea? People complain about how AI-generated code is slow, but if AI can now reliably generate fast code, that changes the debate.